The House of Representatives passed HR4. The bill would restore the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, empowering the Department of Justice to stop voter suppression laws before they go into effect.

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that federal courts have no constitutional role to play in preventing partisan gerrymandering. However, the legislative branch can, in fact, act to mitigate the nefarious effects of gerrymandering. It should do that by passing the Fair Representation Act, which would institute a different election system: the single-transferable vote form of ranked choice voting.

U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker's ruling is the latest in a long history of cases that reaffirm and strengthen the constitutionality of Ranked choice voting.

Santa Clara is a great example of a place where ranked choice voting offers a clear advantage over a single-winner district remedy.

Supporters of ranked choice voting felt the thrill of victory after a judge's ruling

Gill v. Whitford has brought public attention to the threat partisan gerrymandering poses to our democracy.

One thing that unites GOP and Dems: Everybody hates gerrymandering