The fate of partisan gerrymandering is in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court, which is expected to return a joint verdict on two extreme gerrymandering cases—one in North Carolina and another in Maryland—in late June.

Instead of choosing just one candidate, why not allow voters to rank all the contestants in order of preference? Ranked choice voting would not only eliminate the spoiler effect, but it would reduce strategic voting and jumpstart America’s transition away from the two-party system.

As a non-traditional student working full time while attending Riverside Community College, I had the opportunity to work for several national non-profit organizations advocating for the rights of some of the country’s most marginalized communities.

Predictions abounded as the nation’s highest court revisited the now familiar topic in a new pair of cases alleging partisan gerrymandering in North Carolina and Maryland.

SCOTUS gerrymandering cases, RCV for presidential nominations and a recap from Unrig rank among the best of this week's media hits

Lori Lightfoot's historic victory in the Chicago mayoral race still suffered from low voter turnout, while London Breed's election in San Francisco saw the very opposite.

Ranked choice voting was center stage as reformers gathered at the Unrig Summit in Nashville

Kathay Feng of Common Cause explains the significance of Supreme Court hearings on partisan gerrymandering, and the impact on the future of fair maps.

Lee Drutman makes the case for ranked choice popular vote for president, plus new RCV developments in San Francisco and New Jersey

Carlos Ochoa of Ranked Choice Tennessee talks ranked choice voting in Memphis and his motivation for joining the cause