FairVote Feed: Learning Democracy

The Next Generation of Reformers: Reasons for Young People to Get Involved in the Electoral Reform Movement

Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:01:17 -0700

According to The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, an estimated 24% of all eligible young people ages 18-29 voted in the 2010 midterms – in contrast to 51% of eligible voters over 30. Historically, we’re a group that gets ignored a lot by political campaigns and pollsters. The chicken or egg question of youth voter turnout is usually: Do young people not vote because campaigns ignore them, or do campaigns ignore them because we don’t vote?

The 2008 election seemed to prove that young people do vote if they see a reason to participate and are reached out to. The same is true for young people in nonpartisan movements like the environmental movement and organizations like Invisible Children that deal with international conflicts. Young people, especially of the millennial generation, will get excited and involved in elections and organizations if they are specifically targeted.

A lot of the people advocating for structural changes do so because we have problems with the established political culture. The group of people that is 18-29 right now has a lot of reasons to want deep systemic change soon. Because of this, I think that over the next decade we will see groups that are focused on young people intensify their advocacy efforts for election reform issues. Here’s why:

Millennials are more likely not to identify strongly with either party, which means we will want to take advantage of reforms like Ranked Choice Voting. Ranked Choice Voting means that voters don’t have to worry about a “spoiler effect” if they vote for a candidate who’s not polling in the top two spots. It also makes for less divisive campaigning.

We’re very transient, so we benefit from policies like Same Day Registration and Universal Voter Registration. If you move to a state that has different election laws or have to move suddenly, you might miss the deadline to register. These policies mean that no one will be disenfranchised because of a location change.

We’re the most diverse generation ever in America, so we want policies that will treat everyone equally, and are more willing to see the reality of inequality in our country. That could lead to interest in proportional voting systems that elect representatives who better reflect voters.

A lot of us are going to be in debt for the majority of our lives, so any policies that simulate a poll tax like photo ID laws is something that won’t fly with us -- especially when such policies make it more difficult for students to vote.

We’re used to having to figure out new technologies quickly and are used to adapting to the newest model, so registering to vote online and having better voting machines is not something we would shy away from. But we also know the limits of technology, so we will be supportive of checks on election systems, like paper ballots and election audits.

Being smart is cool- not only can we be a more informed electorate, we can be more informed about the system’s current deficiencies. Efforts to improve civic education can heighten awareness.

For instance, these organizations that focus on young people have recently advocated for voting rights and other structural changes:

In 2010, The Bus Project in Portland, OR campaigned against the repeal of the local municipal public-option campaign financing law. The Bus Project’s main objective is to get young people more involved in politics.

League of Young Voters in Portland, ME is crusading against the repeal of Election Day Registration in Maine as we speak. Young people are one of the biggest demographics that Election Day Registration helps, although certainly not the only. Last year the Leauge of Young Voters was involved in advocating for an elected Mayor in Portland and Ranked Choice Voting, both of which are being implemented for the first time this fall, and pushed hard for a nearly successful effort to allow residents who are legal immigrants to vote in city elections.

Young people are also defending their rights at a time when many citizens’ rights are under attack. In New Hampshire, there was a recent attempt to disenfranchise students in the form of an unconstitutional bill in the legislature that sought to bar students originally from out of state from voting in New Hampshire. Students from different colleges in New Hampshire went to the mattresses, and defended the rights of students to vote through protest, testifying in the State Legislature, and reaching out to media.

Students at Yale advocated for National Popular Vote in Connecticut and testified before the Election Laws Committee. Students all over the country are advocating for NPV and making an impact.

Voter pre-registration is a policy that is most effectively advocated for by the people it affects- young people ages 16 and 17, or people that were recently high school age. The Rhode Island Young Democrats successfully advocated for voter pre-registration in their state, which has been in effect since early 2010.

Groups like this mean that the next generation of election reformers is already active. But if we want to capitalize on all the reasons why this particular group should be calling for reforms like Ranked Choice Voting, Right to Vote, Pre-registration, and more, we need to make sure our message is reaching them.

Democracy, Schools, and the Internet...Oh, My!

Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:54:46 -0700

The Internet has made many everyday tasks easier, from looking up a business to finding a recipe for foreign cuisine, and participation in politics is no exception. In Australia, where they are having a federal election on August 21st, one teacher took advantage of the political climate and interest in technology to get his students involved. They set up a blog where they could interview politicians, as well as a twitter account to keep the public updated on their activities. These Year 8 students (equivalent to United States eighth graders) now seem to have become political analysts in their own way and have brought civic education to a whole new level.

We hope American teachers are given opportunities to pursue similar creative ideas. The motivation behind FairVote’s initiatives is to create a democracy founded on treating every vote with respect, which our democracy currently does not. Civic education is a large part of that effort. Without an educated populous, the efficacy of democracy deteriorates. We need to target voters using creative initiatives that explore the full potential of all the resources available to us in this information age. Social networking sites like twitter, blogs, and Facebook, can be of great use in reaching out to young voters or even would-be voters, not by creating corny videos that patronize, but by making information available to them through sites they check every day.

The Australian class is a perfect example not just of how to use technology, but also for how to use the classroom as a direct route to young people. Schools, after all, are the most efficient and broad-based way to provide civic education to young voters-to-be. FairVote’s “Learning Democracy” curriculum manages to engage students through powerpoint presentations that facilitate discussions about policy issues and voting rights in addition to an interactive history of suffrage. It was developed by FairVote in conjunction with curriculum experts, and can be adapted to different classroom settings.

As our own 2010 mid-term elections and 2012 presidential election approach, it’s time to think about recruiting the newest generation of voters. Many campaigns already use Facebook and Twitter to attract supporters, and with a little bit of a change in target audience, many more students and young people could be reached through these media outlets. As the civics teacher in Australia realized, a federal election is too great of a “teachable moment” to pass up. Let his work be inspiring, not limiting—figure out an innovative way to get teens, whether they are your peers, students, or children. Get involved!

Sen. Byrd and Constitution Day

Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:34:37 -0700

Senator Robert Byrd (D-W. Va) died at 92 this morning after being admitted to a Fairfax, VA hospital last week for heat exhaustion. Byrd, who was elected to serve a record-breaking nine consecutive terms in the Senate following three terms in the House, is remembered in the many obituaries that appeared today for his unwavering dedication to the needs of the people he represented. His colleagues also characterized him by remembering his impassioned speeches and his love of the Constitution. Reported to have carried a pocket-sized copy of the Constitution around for reference, Byrd devoted himself to the words of this country's founders-and wanted every American to do the same through Constitution Day.

Byrd successfully pushed for legislation in 2004 that deemed September 17^th "Constitution Day." According to the law, all federally-funded schools are mandated to teach their students about the U.S. Constitution in some form on that day, from elementary schools to the college level. Initially, the legislation received mixed reviews; while teachers did not appreciate another federal mandate, many legislators wanted students to know more about their country's founding document than they do about television shows.

Six years later, though lesson plans and activities for all ages abound on the Internet, teachers still struggle to find time to fit Constitution Day-based lessons into their curriculum. Furthermore, many teachers feel that the requirement is redundant, as they already teach about the Constitution at other points during the year. In Montgomery County, Maryland, for example, students are required to take a course on national, state, and local government, which includes Constitution lessons in the curriculum, and teachers have told me that singling out one day to focus on it seems superfluous. On the other hand, some colleges, like the Milwaukee School of Engineering, hold special events for a week surrounding Constitution Day. There are plenty of resources available to you if want to celebrate the Constitution in your own schools (see list at the end of this post).

Most educators would agree that the Constitution is something every resident of the U.S. should know and understand, so please take the time to teach it, even if it is in a simple way. FairVote has a particular suggestion relating to our belief that we should prepare our young people to be active participants in our democracy. Knowledge of the law and civic participation (such as how and why to vote) need to be ingrained in the brains of new voters, especially when only 59 percent of eligible voters 18-24 are registered, compared to 71 percent registered of eligible voters overall, according to the FairVote fact sheet. Knowledgeable young voters become voters for life. One talent teenagers are known for is their ability to talk; if one friend knows how to vote, they can tell others, and so on. After Sen. Jamie Raskin's successful legislation in 2007, Maryland law authorizes school systems to specify curricula for their students, but we hope to see more schools and teachers take it one step further. Recognizing Constitution Day is a vital step in this process of getting young people involved and interested in the laws and people that govern them. Democracy cannot function with an indifferent populace.

Links to resources:

FairVote's Learning Democracy curriculum: http://www.fairvote.org/lesson-plans

American Bar Association activities: http://www.abanet.org/publiced/conversations/constitution/lessons.shtml

The Constitution Center's page with resources and events: http://www.constitutioncenter.org/ncc_progs_Constitution_Day.aspx

Center for Civic Education activities for grades K-12: http://www.civiced.org/index.php?page=constitution_day

The American Political Science Association resources:
http://www.apsanet.org/content_20191.cfm

See a list of what colleges and universities are doing:

http://www.nasfaa.org/publications/2007/rconstitution083107.html

FairVote testifies to Maryland Senate Committee

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:11:52 -0800

Yesterday, the Maryland Senate Education, Health & Environmental Committee held a public hearing on several election bills. FairVote’s Right to Vote Director Adam Fogel testified in favor of two of the bills that are sponsored by Sen. Jamie Raskin (D-20):
- SB 292, which will set a uniform voter registration age of 16
- SB 293, which will establish a permanent absentee ballot list.

Youth preregistration bills have been introduced and debated in the Maryland Legislature for the last three years now, as part of policies designed to encourage voter registration and participation. As Adam Fogel stated in his testimony, “Maryland’s 18 to 24-year-old voter registration rate is below the national average and is in danger of falling further if policies are not enacted now to increase voter registration opportunities for our youth.”

SB 292 was unopposed during the hearing, and notably supported by the County Council at-large candidate Hans Riemer, Ryan O’Donnell from Common Cause Maryland, Fielding Huseth from Maryland PIRG, and by the Maryland League of Women Voters. FairVote is optimistic that the bill will be favorably reported by the Committee and signed by the Governor at the end of the legislative session. If Maryland enacts the bill this year, they’ll join the list of states with 16-year-old registration: Hawaii, Florida, North Carolina, Rhode Island and the District of Columbia.

You can read Adam’s testimony for SB 292 here.

FairVote was also particularly interested in the permanent absentee ballot list proposal as a way to expand access to the polls. As Adam Fogel stressed it in his testimony, SB 293 would ensure that the most vulnerable among us (senior citizens in nursing homes, disabled citizens), as well as students studying out-of-state, and overseas voters, have the chance to cast a ballot in every election without having the burden of submitting an absentee ballot request before every single election. This bill would considerably strengthen Maryland law, according to which citizens do not need any excuse to vote absentee, and we’re hopeful that the Committee will report it favorably.

You can read Adam’s testimony for SB 293 here.

You can watch video of Adam Fogel, Ryan O'Donnell and Hans Riemer testifying below:

Watch the video on YouTube

The Gap (Redux)

Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:11:30 -0800

While the Registration Gap between young people and the general population is a significant problem, an even more troubling gap is found in a new CIRCLE working paper titled, "Democracy for Some: The Civic Opportunity Gap in High School," by Joseph Kahne and Ellen Middaugh.

The authors "found that a student's race and academic track, and a school's average socioeconomic status (SES) determines the availability of the school-based civic learning opportunities that promote voting and broader forms of civic engagement." Furthermore, in all three of their studies, they observed that "students who are more academically successful or white and those with parents of higher socioeconomic status receive more classroom-based civic learning opportunities."

As I've written about previously, young people are turning out and voting at a higher rate than ever before during this presidential primary season. They are paying attention to the race and learning about the issues, but this study shows that not all young people are given the tools they need to become active participants in the democratic process. In fact, those young people who need the most attention (whose parents' don't vote) are getting even less classroom education about citizenship than those students who would probably be registered to vote anyway.

The numbers speak for themselves: In the Feb. 5th "Super Tuesday" contests, 18 to 29-year-olds with more education than high school were 18-percentage points more likely to vote than students with high school education or less. Put another way, 79-percent of the youth vote had more than high school education, while 21-percent had high school or less.

These facts, coupled together, should make youth voting activists take a step back and reevaluate how we talk about "the youth vote." While it's great that more young people are participating in the political process, we have to be aware that "young people" are not a monolithic group. Young people whose parents' don't vote or where their schools are not emphasizing civics (because they have to focus on reading, science, math, etc.) are being left behind. This inequity in schools is creating an underclass of citizens who lack the basic mechanics of participation. Things like how to request an absentee ballot or what it means to "vote provisionally" or even what to expect on Election Day, are basic lessons every young person should learn before graduation.

FairVote is working to ensure more young people who come from disadvantaged communities or whose parents don't participate in the political process have the same opportunities as their more affluent counterparts. We've introduced a civics curriculum called Learning Democracy that explores the history of suffrage and teaches the mechanics of participation. We also advocate for policies that makes conducing effective voter registration drives easier for high schools, like setting a uniform voter registration age of 16-years-old.

Both "gaps" that I've written about over the past couple of weeks are connected in a significant way. Voter registration policy in this county needs to put an emphasis on equality--ensuring all young people, regardless of their parents' voting behavior or where they grow up have an equal opportunity to register to vote and learn the mechanics of participation. As we move full-speed-ahead towards November's general election, I hope the media pays attention to these "gaps" in our civil society and the presidential candidates (of both parties) address this basic inequality in our education system.