Fairvote.org is currently undergoing an upgrade, and some features may not be working as usual. We apologize for any inconvenience, and expect to be back at full capacity soon.

2012 Congressional Elections Demonstrate Need for Fair Voting

FairVote has analyzed the 2012 congressional elections, and the results are conclusive: it's time to get rid of winner-take-all and elect Congress using fair voting methods. Here are some highlights from our coverage of the recent election:

  • Partisan Bias in U.S. House Elections: In a Washington Post op-ed, FairVote Executive Director Rob Richie argues that House elections have a significant structural bias in favor of Republicans as a result of winner-take-all elections
  • The Vanishing Congressional Moderate: Moderates in Congress have all but disappeared, and fair voting is the best way to bring them back¬†
  • Most Voters Wanted a Democratic House: FairVote's unique analytic methods show that although the Republicans won the House, 52% of voters preferred Democratic candidates
  • FairVote Correctly Predicts 333 House Races: In July, FairVote made projections for 333 of the 435 congressional races in the 2012 election, all of which proved to be correct
  • Monopoly Politics 2012:¬†Detailed state profiles and analysis about the 2012 House elections, including election projections¬†
  • Fair Voting 2012: Comprised of the Fair Voting Interactive Map, Fair Voting Plans for 50 States, and supporting analysis and documentation, Fair Voting 2012 presents a new way of electing the U.S. House of Representatives that aims to correct the political impasse reinforced by our current winner-take-all system by instituting fair voting systems of proportional representation, grounded in our American electoral traditions
  • Examples of Fair Voting Systems: A description of four fair voting proportional systems that could be implemented under the Fair Voting 2012 plan