Our Mission: FairVote advances systemic electoral reform to achieve a fully participatory and truly representative democracy that respects every vote and every voice in every election. We work toward these goals by providing advocates with innovative research and reform strategy. We promote ranked choice voting (“instant runoff”), a constitutionally protected right to vote, a national popular vote for president, and, most fundamentally, fair representation voting forms of proportional representation.

  • Blog and News

    New from the Blog

    • Don't Let Ferguson Turnout Numbers Fool You. America, We Have a Problem.

      April 9, 2015

      IVotedVoter turnout in city council elections in Ferguson (MO) increased, and its elected representation is more reflective of its citizenry. But it's not time to celebrate. Executive director Rob Richie analyzes this story as part of disturbing trend in local voter turnout.



    • Cumulative Voting Wins in Peoria

      April 8, 2015

      BethJensenPeoria, Illinois held an election yesterday for five of its city council seats in which voters had cumulative voting rights. Since 1991, Peoria has used cumulative voting to elect its five at-large City Councilmen, leading to increased minority representation.


    • Oklahoma Voter Turnout Suffers without National Popular Vote Plan

      March 13, 2015

      OklahomaPicThe current Electoral College system -- one that Oklahoma state legislators have the power to help change -- leaves Oklahoma voters at a disadvantage during and between presidential elections. A comparison of voter turnout patterns in Oklahoma and Virginia tells the story, contradicting inaccurate analysis from an Oklahoma think tank.

    FairVote Reforms Gain Media Coverage

    // April 6, 2015

    FairVote loves the news, and the news loves FairVote! Our reforms are making headlines. Here's the latest: 

    • Join FairVote for its National Democracy Slam conference on April 22!  Explore 17 bold ideas for breaking partisan gridlock, ending gerrymandering, and improving America's elections and politics. Speakers include US Congress members to community organizers.
    • FairVote and the Bipartisan Policy Center released a new report, Best Practices for Collaborative Policymaking. FairVote researchers examine state legislatures, and identify and recommend rules/practices that can empower bipartisan cooperation.
    • Michael Golden highlights FairVote's reforms in his new book, Unlock Congress, about congressional gridlock and innovative solutions. The book will be released April 15.
    • The New York Times published a Letter to the Editor written by FairVote's Executive Director Rob Richie on the need for fair representation voting systems and other reforms.
    • FairVote's Dania Korkor and Rob Richie advocated for more democratic special elections in the Baltimore Sun.
    • Ranked choice voting in Maine is turning heads and gaining support. Recent media pieces include an op-ed from the Portland Press Herald and this Letter to the Editor from the Republican Journal.
    • Check out FairVote's Blogspot site for quick access to important election reform news.

    Catch the FairVote Reformer for the latest updates on systemic election reform.

  • Research

    The Role of Cities in National Popular Vote Elections

    Rob Richie, Andrea Levien, // June 13, 2014
    Cites Pic

    In debating options for reforming presidential elections in the United States, the most promising alternative to the status quo is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPV). But even though we use popular vote elections to select every member of Congress and all 50 governors, some NPV skeptics warn that its adoption would have a partisan impact on presidential elections. They fear that Democrats could increase their national vote totals by focusing resources on major metropolitan areas, while Republicans could achieve similar gains only by spreading their resources across more geographically dispersed, non-urban areas. This report challenges this argument in three ways. 

    Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral Votes

    Claire Daviss, Rob Richie // January 28, 2015

    States have a constitutional obligation to decide how they will allocate their electoral votes during presidential elections. Almost all states currently use statewide, winner-take-all rules, which gives all of the state's votes to the winner of the statewide popular vote. But some states have considered alternative methods, such as the whole number proportional system and the congressional district system. We look at the effect these systems would have on presidential elections. Neither system promotes majority rule, increases competitiveness nationwide, or ensures voter equality.

  • Media

    FairVote Voices

    On the latest episode of FairVote Voices:

    An interview with Mayor Mike Brennan of Portland, Maine on how ranked choice voting influenced how he campaigned and how he governs.

    Jerome 2 lyn Legal fellow Drew Spencer interviews Jerome Gray about his career fighting for voting rights and fair voting in Alabama.


    urlA history of FairVote and what it does: In this special two-part episode, Drew Spencer interviews FairVote Executive Director Rob Richie about FairVote's history, reforms, and projects.


    Click here for archives of prior episodes, or click here to access our page on the iTunes store.

    FairVote Videos

    For more FairVote videos, visit our YouTube channel.  

    Reform 2020Watch our Reform 2020 video about FairVote's vision for a democracy that truly represents American diversity. 


    Elizabeth gSee Elizabeth Glidden discuss her Minneapolis' experience with ranked choice voting.