Posted on March 06, 2006On March 2, FairVote and California Common Cause filed an amicus brief to defend the California Voting Rights Act and argue that proportional voting systems are sensible remedies in such cases.
Adopted in 2001, the California Voting Rights Act showcases how states can protect voting rights even when Congress may weaken the federal Voting Rights Act. Among other provisions, the Act allows plaintiffs to challenge winner-take-all, at-large election systems when racially polarized voting exists. The Lawyers Commitee for Civil Rights filed such a challenge in Sanchez v. City of Modesto, but a judge struck down the Act.
FairVote and Common Cause argue that remedies like proportional voting systems can address the impact of winner-take-all, at-large voting methods. Beyond this case, FairVote urges other states to consider state Voting Rights Acts and, for those challenging winner-take-all at-large systems, to look to proportional systems as a sensible remedy.
[ Application for leave to file amicus ]
[ Brief of Amici Curiae ]
[ FairVote support for reauthorizing federal Voting Rights Act ]
[ Talking points on state Voting Rights Acts ]
[ What is proportional voting? ]