Why Blagojevich scandal on Senate vacancy can push us to elections, not selections

December 10th, 2008
Rob Richie

Rob Richie is director of FairVote. See his page at fairvote.org for more information.

The remarkable story that Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has been arrested for exploring how to trade his selection of a candidate to fill Barack Obama’s Senate seat for favors or money simply underscores the remarkable undemocratic nature of so many state laws giving governors this remarkable power.

No U.S. House Member has ever served without being elected. Even though U.S. Senators are more powerful than House Members and are no longer appointed by state legislators when serving a complete term, far too many states have have this odd anachronim of governor selections– leaving us with two of our largest states (NY and IL) soon to have Senators only accountable to the governors in NY and IL who appointed them.

My colleague David Moon had a good oped in The Hill on this issue last year.

We also did one of our Innovative Analysis series on the issue of Senate vacancy procedures last year.

Other posts by Rob Richie

One Response to “Why Blagojevich scandal on Senate vacancy can push us to elections, not selections”

  1. 1 John personal trainers austin tx
    December 10th, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    I am reading Theodore Rex now. During TR’s time Senators were still selected. Blagojevich needs to cut his bangs and IL needs to hold a special election.

Leave a Reply