Ontario MMP video roundup
May 31st, 2007
Jack
Jack Santucci was FairVote staff from 2005-07.
The Google alerts for YouTube came in, one thing led to another, and I stumbled on this video. Evidently produced by the Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform, it explains what the Assembly was, the process it used to arrive at a consensus, why that consensus was on MMP and just a little bit of how MMP would work in practice.
Technically speaking, we’re looking at two votes (one list, one district) with a 3% threshold.
For more on the mechanics of mixed-member proportional voting - how one votes and how it affects the allocation of seats - see a great Flash animation produced by the Citizens’ Assembly, featuring Billy Ballot and Nina News. One key point from that video: despite Ontario’s “majoritarian” winner-take-all system, there has not been a majority government elected on a majority of province-wide votes since 1937.
Apparently we’re to stay tuned for more videos on MMP by Steve Withers. Withers went to New Zealand to help the successful electoral reform push there in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
The Citizens’ Assembly process in Ontario is a remarkable thing, and that first video drives this fact home. This is the second time a Canadian province has trusted ‘average citizens’ to talk about their electoral system - even if the government set the referendum bar a bit too high at 60%. It’s also proof that these issues are not as Byzantine as editorial page detractors would have us believe.
FairVote supports this approach to reform, and there’s been particular effort to advance a Citizens’ Assembly in California. I would be pleasantly shocked, however, if the major parties in any state ceded this kind of power to average people - or to public reason in general. It’s easier for them to target the same handful of districts year after year.
Other posts by Jack
- Understanding progressives' presidential picks - June 26th, 2007
- Ontario MMP vote hits U.S. blogosphere - June 22nd, 2007
- Fatah calls for proportional voting in Palestine - June 22nd, 2007
- Fifth annual Democratic IRV straw poll - June 21st, 2007
- McCain: Front-loaded primary schedule is "bizarre" - June 19th, 2007
- Back at Take Back - June 18th, 2007
- Turkey, women and PR lists - June 6th, 2007
- Ontario MMP video roundup - May 31st, 2007
- Open thread: Ranked voting activism - May 28th, 2007
- Proportional apportionment vs. proportional representation - May 25th, 2007
May 31st, 2007 at 7:36 pm
The parties and politicians will respond to demands from voters and party supporters. There must be a popular movement for change…..it won’t come from the top. es, real work is required….No easy options are available.
June 1st, 2007 at 1:24 am
It’s too bad CA legislation died last year. Jack, you mentioned there was an effort to revive this, are you able to tell us a little bit more about this? It definetly deserves another chance. This model could also be used to address issues like healthcare.
June 6th, 2007 at 1:24 pm
No legislative proposals for a Citizens Assembly are currently pending in California. The last bill that called for a Citizens Assembly, ACA 28, sponsored by Assemblyman Canciamilla, was introduced in the last legislative session.