A House bill that would make
Vancouver the state's center for a five-year experiment with a new
voting method -- instant runoff voting -- has reached the floor of
the state Senate.
The Senate Government Operations and
Elections Committee voted 7-6 Tuesday in favor of the bill, passed
by the House earlier this month.
House Bill 2669 would establish a
five-year pilot project overseen by the secretary of state to
authorize instant runoff voting in nonpartisan elections for city
officials. In instant runoff voting, each voter ranks ballot
selections rather than simply voting for one candidate.
The bill was specifically tailored
for Vancouver, said state Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, who is the
bill's primary sponsor. In 1999, Vancouver voters passed a charter
amendment allowing election of council members by instant runoff
voting. The city needs authority from the Legislature to proceed.
"The bill is just about local
control in Vancouver," said Brent White, an advocate for the
Coalition for Instant Runoff Voting in Washington.
The House supported similar
legislation last year, but it died in the Senate committee.
Under the method, any candidate who
receives a majority of the votes wins. If there is no majority of
first-choice votes, the candidate who received the fewest
first-choice votes is dropped. The second-choice votes of those who
favored the dropped candidate then count as first-choice votes. The
process of elimination continues until a candidate receives a
majority.
"Nobody is ever elected that doesn't
get more than 50 percent of the vote," Moeller said. "There is no
more plurality."
Moeller said the method saves money
for cities because it eliminates primaries, which, in Vancouver,
cost about $100,000 a primary. He said the secretary of state would
provide the $36,000 for the pilot project.
"It will also give more
participation in the voting process because people won't just have
to pick one," he said. "There is better voter choice. There is also
less mudslinging, and it allows every candidate to run all the way
through to the general election."
"I think it would capture the
interest of voters if it could only be instituted," said Cherie
Davidson, a lobbyist with the League of Women Voters of Washington.
Davidson expressed concerns about
instituting the process initially in too large an area.
"It has a fairly complicated
counting system," she said.
If instant runoff voting is passed,
Moeller said, an educational campaign would inform voters on the new
system. The votes would be hand-counted.
Rep. Marc Boldt, R-Hockinson, one of
26 who voted against the bill this year, said many of his
constituents opposed the idea.
"I just felt that there were other
ways to go about it," Boldt said. "The constituents said they like
it the way it is, and I had to go with them."
In Massachusetts, the city of Cambridge uses [a
multi-seat variation
of] instant runoff voting, and San Francisco has passed
legislation to begin using the method in November.