Better Elections Are Possible

Brooks_for_Website.png

“Partisans’ chief interest is in proving that the other party is despicable — in ramping up fear, hatred and the negative polarization that is the central feature of contemporary American politics…

The good news is that we don’t have to live with this system. There’s nothing in the Constitution that says there have to be only two parties. There’s nothing in the Constitution about parties at all. There’s not even anything in the Constitution mandating that each congressional district have only one member and be represented by one party. We could have a much fairer and better system with the passage of a law.

The way to do that is through multimember districts and ranked-choice voting.”

— David Brooks in “One Reform to Save America”
New York Times

Join Us Today to Help Create a More Perfect Union

Ranked Choice Voting

Our Solution

Our Solution

Ranked choice voting gives every voter a meaningful vote.

The Problem

The Problem

When voters feel like they have to choose between the lesser-of-two-evils, that's not real choice.

Get Involved

Get Involved

Check out our Activist Toolkit to advocate for better elections with ranked choice voting.

Where it's used

Ranked choice voting is used in cities across the country 

infogram_0_cb1ad06b-2ae8-48a3-a5f0-8227e0b8a626Where Ranked Choice Voting is used_7/28/16//e.infogr.am/js/embed.js?YFitext/javascript

Quick Takes

FairVote's brief and timely commentary on the latest news.

Five reforms to fix our nation's inequality of democracy

Rich Robinson

Two professors believe ranked choice voting could help fix Washington's broken policymaking.

Read More

The Economist backs ranked choice voting to reduce partisanship

Rich Robinson

Second thoughts about first-past-the-post outcomes have the editors thinking about reforming America's electoral process.

Read More